I predict that I'll have roughly the same failure rate. Have NO users on it, no internet, no outside influences and see how reliable the back ups are. I would like to isolate these from any other part of my network. An Exchange server, an SQL server, a file server and a BE 2010 (or any other version really, but 2010 had been the most miserable for me).
I swear, I want to do a test where I build a separate network. I currently have 2 - 2010 servers with two tape libraries.
Then another job that's run perfectly for 9 months will fail for no reason and nothing will get it going again until you rebuild the job. Every morning is another seeming random job failure for no reason. As a result it's become more and more unreliable and unstable. It gradually starting getting bloated and unreasonably complicated. It was solid, it worked, it was simple and I couldn't stop saying good things about it. See, Backup Exec used to be a great product. Yeah, I'm pretty sure this is part of Symantec's "Random Error Generator" (REG).
0 kommentar(er)
